Cards Stay the Same, Money Moves on the Blockchain: The Future of Onchain Settlement Chosen by Stripe and Visa

-

3-Point Summary

  • Between 2025 and 2026, global payment infrastructure is rapidly shifting toward onchain settlement using stablecoins.
  • Stripe and Visa began in different markets but are converging on the same model: Web2 user experience with Web3 settlement.
  • Both companies are redefining global payments by moving the settlement layer to Ethereum mainnet and L2 networks.
Stripe and Visa Onchain Settlement Image

Stripe and Visa are converging on the same model: Web2 user experience with Web3 settlement.

50-Second Shorts Video

Watch the 50-second video to understand how Stripe and Visa are redefining global payments before diving into the full analysis below.

The Onchain Shift of Global Payments: How Stripe and Visa Are Defining a New Standard

Between 2025 and 2026, global payment infrastructure is rapidly being reshaped around onchain settlement using stablecoins. Stripe and Visa started from different markets, but they are ultimately converging in the same direction.

“Users pay the same way they always have. The money moves like Web3.”

1. Stripe — Bringing Onchain Settlement to Online Payments

Starting with its acquisition of Bridge in 2025, Stripe began migrating the backend of online payments to onchain settlement. The user-facing screens and experience remain unchanged, while only the post-payment money movement layer is replaced with Web3 infrastructure.

  • Operating in 18 countries as of March 2026
  • Planned expansion to over 100 countries by year-end
  • USDC-based payments applied to SaaS, commerce, and creator businesses
  • Web2 checkout UX preserved, with only settlement moved to Web3

Stripe’s settlements are processed on Ethereum mainnet or L2 networks such as Base and Optimism. This significantly accelerates cross-border payment speed and reduces fees.

2. Visa — Onchain Settlement for the Global Card Network

In March 2026, Visa announced that, in collaboration with Bridge (acquired by Stripe), it would expand its stablecoin-linked card program to over 100 countries. This is effectively an attempt to move the settlement layer of the existing card network onchain.

  • Already live in 18 countries across Latin America
  • Planned expansion to Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East by the end of 2026
  • Supports multiple stablecoins including USDC, USDG, and EURC
  • Enables stablecoin payments at 175 million merchants worldwide
  • Settlements processed on Ethereum mainnet or L2 networks such as Base and Optimism

Visa has effectively become the first major card network to adopt Ethereum as a global settlement backend.

3. Stripe × Visa: Web2 UX, Web3 Settlement

The two companies target different markets, but they are converging on the same strategic direction.

Stripe focuses on online businesses and the digital economy, keeping the familiar checkout UX while moving backend settlement onchain. Visa, on the other hand, builds on offline merchants and the global card network, preserving the existing card payment flow while replacing only the settlement layer with stablecoin-based infrastructure. In other words, Stripe is “onchain-ifying internet payments,” while Visa is “onchain-ifying the card network.” Both start from different markets but share the same goal: shifting the movement of money to Web3.

4. Real-World User Scenarios

Scenario 1: A User Paying via Stripe Checkout

  1. The user enters card details and completes payment through Stripe Checkout.
  2. Once the payment is authorized, Stripe executes USDC-based onchain settlement in the backend.
    Settlement is processed on Ethereum mainnet or L2 networks such as Base and Optimism.
  3. The merchant receives a settlement confirmation within seconds.
  4. The merchant can immediately convert the received USDC to fiat or move it to L2 to reduce fees.

Scenario 2: Using a Visa Stablecoin Card at an Offline Store

  1. The user taps or swipes their Visa card at a payment terminal, just like any traditional card payment.
  2. The payment is authorized instantly, but settlement is processed in stablecoins via the Visa → Bridge → Ethereum network path.
  3. Settlement occurs on Ethereum mainnet or L2 networks such as Base and Optimism.
  4. The merchant receives funds not in 1–3 days as with traditional Visa settlement, but within seconds to a few minutes.

5. Conclusion

Stripe and Visa started from different domains, but both are turning onchain settlement into a foundational layer of global payments.

  • Stripe: Onchain settlement for online payments
  • Visa: Onchain settlement for the global card network

“Users pay the way they always have. The money moves like Web3.”

Younchan Jung
Researcher exploring structural shifts in AI, blockchain, and the on‑chain economy.

If you would like to read this article in Korean, please click the button below.

댓글

댓글 쓰기

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

Ethereum’s Quiet Takeover: How Stablecoins and Tokenized Assets Are Rewriting Global Finance

-
이미지
Ethereum’s Quiet Takeover: How Stablecoins and Tokenized Assets Are Rewriting Global Finance In 2026, the global financial system is undergoing a profound transformation—quiet on the surface, but seismic underneath. At the center of this shift is Ethereum . Once viewed simply as a smart‑contract platform, Ethereum has now become the settlement and liquidity backbone of global finance, reshaping the very structure of how money and assets move. How Ethereum Became the Foundation of Global Finance Stablecoin payments and real‑world asset tokenization (RWA) are expanding faster than ever. What’s striking is that this movement is no longer led by crypto startups. Instead, Visa, Stripe, PayPal, JPMorgan, BlackRock, and Fidelity —the world’s largest financial institutions—are building new financial infrastructure directly on Ethereum. Recent on‑chain data highlights the scale of this shift: Tokenized funds: 31,300 holders Tokenized equities: 21,000 holders Tokenized commodities: 116,...
자세한 내용 보기

The Real Reason the CLARITY Act Stalled: A USDC Yield War Between Coinbase and the Banks

-
이미지
3-Point Summary The CLARITY Act stalled not because of regulators, but due to internal industry conflict. The core battle centers on whether stablecoins like USDC should be allowed to generate yield. Coinbase’s opposition to a yield ban significantly weakened political momentum for the bill. The CLARITY Act stalled because the industry itself couldn’t agree on who controls the economics of digital dollars. 50-Second Shorts Video '" style="cursor: pointer; position: relative; width: 100%; aspect-ratio: 1/1; border-radius: 8px; overflow: hidden;"> Watch the 50-second video to understand why the CLARITY Act stalled before diving into the full analysis below. Why the CLARITY Act Stalled: Not Regulation, but an Internal War 1) What the CLARITY Act Was Trying to Do The CLARITY Act is ...
자세한 내용 보기

비트코인은 자산, 이더리움은 인프라: 기관이 다시 짜는 글로벌 금융의 판도

-
이미지
비트코인과 이더리움—같은 기관 채택, 완전히 다른 두 개의 트랙 기관들의 암호자산 채택 속도가 눈에 띄게 빨라지고 있다. 하지만 이 흐름 속에서 비트코인과 이더리움이 맡고 있는 역할은 근본적으로 다르다. 비트코인은 기관의 포트폴리오에 편입되는 ‘보유 자산’ 으로 자리 잡고 있고, 이더리움은 글로벌 금융 시스템이 다시 구축되는 ‘운영 인프라’ 로 기능하고 있다. 이 둘은 경쟁 관계가 아니라, 새로운 금융 아키텍처를 구성하는 두 개의 기둥이다. 1. 비트코인: 기관이 ‘보유하는 자산’ 최근 블랙록이 단 10거래일 만에 17,645 BTC(약 11억 6천만 달러) 를 매수한 사실은 시장의 시선을 사로잡았다. 이는 채굴자들이 생산하는 속도보다 더 빠르게 비트코인을 흡수하는 수준이다. 기관들이 비트코인을 반드시 보유해야 하는 자산 으로 인식하고 있다는 강력한 신호다. 비트코인이 기관 포트폴리오에서 차지하는 의미는 명확하다. ETF 운영을 위한 재고 확보 블랙록의 IBIT 현물 ETF는 투자자 수요를 충족하기 위해 대량의 BTC를 보유해야 한다. 기관 고객에게 제공하는 규제된 비트코인 접근성 연기금, 보험사, 국부펀드 등은 직접 보관 리스크 없이 비트코인에 노출되기를 원한다. 디지털 금으로서의 포지셔닝 래리 핑크는 비트코인을 글로벌 거시 자산, 가치 저장 수단, 인플레이션 헤지로 규정해 왔다. 장기적 희소성에 대한 선제적 대응 블랙록의 공격적 매수는 희소 자산을 조기에 확보하려는 전형적인 기관 전략이다. 결국 비트코인은 금고에 보관되는 자산 , 즉 디지털 금이다. 기관은 비트코인을 ‘운영’하지 않는다. 보유한다. 2. 이더리움: 금융 자산이 실제로 ‘움직이는 인프라’ 이더리움은 완전히 다른 질문에 답한다. “금융 자산은 어디에서 발행되고, 이동하고, 결제되고, 운영될 것인가?” 기관들은 ETH를 단순히 사들이는 것이 아니라, 이더리움 위에 금융 시스템을 구축하고 있다. 대표적인 사례는 다음과 같다. JP Morgan — Onyx, JPM Co...
자세한 내용 보기